European Journal of Dentistry 年发文量-刊鹿论文编译

Assessment of Extrusion and Postoperative Pain of a Bioceramic and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer

Abstract:

Objectives \u2003The objective of this study was to compare a bioceramic and a resin-based endodontic sealer with regard to extrusion and postoperative pain. Materials and Methods \u2003Sixty-four patients requiring endodontic treatment of single-rooted maxillary teeth with necrotic pulps were included in this study. The root canal treatments were performed in a single visit using a size 40.06 single-file reciprocating system under 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. After irrigation with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2.5% NaOCl, the canals were dried and randomly divided into two different groups ( n = 32) depending on the sealer used: resin-based group (RG) in which the canals were filled with the AH Plus, and the bioceramic group (BG) in which the canals were filled with the Sealer Plus BC. Ibuprofen (600 mg) was prescribed every 6 hours if the volunteers experienced pain. The patients registered their pain sensation in a visual analog scale (VAS) card, ranging from 0 to 10 at 24-hour, 48-hour, 72-hour, and 1-week intervals. Statistical analysis \u2003For statistical analysis, the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results \u2003Sealer extrusion occurred in nine patients of the RG and in 19 patients of the BG ( p < 0.05). The average pain level at 24-hour and 48-hour intervals was, respectively, 1.46 ± 1.96 and 0.44 ± 0.86 for RG, and 1.21 ± 2.09 and 0.09 ± 0.38 for BG. There was no report of pain after 48 hours. The mean number of tablets taken for pain relief was 0.03 ± 0.17 for RG and 0.06 ± 0.24 for BG. No statistically significant difference was found with regard to pain level and intake of pain killer tablets ( p > 0.05). Conclusions \u2003The BG sealer presented significantly more extrusion than the RG sealer. Sealer extrusion was not associated with pain. The average pain level and the mean number of tablets taken for pain relief were similar in both groups.

Author Listing： Braúlio Fonseca;Marcelo Santos Coelho;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno;Carlos Eduardo Fontana;Alexandre Sigrist De Martin;Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha

Volume： 13

Pages： 343 - 348

DOI： 10.1055/s-0039-3399457

Language： English

Journal： European Journal of Dentistry

European Journal of Dentistry

影响因子：0.0

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：1305-7456

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Thieme

期刊介绍

年发文量	209
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	0%
自引率	0.0%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
0.00%	0.00%	-	-

预警情况

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q0区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区（2021-2022年最新版）

中科院分区

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
暂无数据