European Journal of Dentistry 投稿经验-刊鹿论文编译

Do the New Hydrophilic Surface Have Any Influence on Early Success Rate and Implant Stability during Osseointegration Period? Four-Month Preliminary Results from a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract:

Objective The objective of this study is to compare the implant stability of Hiossen ET III implants with its new hydrophilic (NH) surface and Hiossen ET III implants with the sandblasted and acid-etched (SA) surface. Materials and Methods Patients required at least two teeth to be rehabilitated with a fixed, implant-supported restoration, consecutively enrolled. Patients randomly received SA surface implants (SA group) or SA implants with a newly developed bioabsorbable apatite nanocoating (NH group). Outcome measures were implant and prosthetic survival rate, complications, insertion torque, and implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at implant placement and every week up to 8 weeks after implant placement. Comparison between groups was made by unpaired t -test, while the comparison between each follow-up will be made by paired t -tests to detect any change during the follow-up. Complications and failures were compared using Fisher s exact test. Results A total of 14 patients were treated with 28 implants (14 SA and 14 NH). No implant and prosthesis failed 4 months after implant placement. No complications were experienced. At the 2nd week after implants placement, two implants in the SA group showed discontinuous measurements versus none in the NH group ( p = 0.4815). Implants unscrewed during ISQ measurements and were rescrewed. Data recording stopped for 6 weeks. Both implants osseointegrated without any further complication. The NH implants did not show physiological ISQ decrease between 2nd and 4th week after implant placement, showing a more even pattern of ISQ values compared with SA implants (77.1 ± 4.6 vs. 72.9 ± 11.5; difference: 4.2 ± 12.1; p = 0.258). High ISQ values were found in both groups at each time point. Conclusions NH implants are a viable alternative to SA surface, as they seem to avoid the ISQ drop during the remodeling phase.

Author Listing： Marco Tallarico;Nicola Baldini;Matteo Martinolli;Erta Xhanari;Yong-Jin Kim;Gabriele Cervino;Silvio Mario Meloni

Volume： 13

Pages： 95 - 101

DOI： 10.1055/s-0039-1688737

Language： English

Journal： European Journal of Dentistry

European Journal of Dentistry

影响因子：2.1

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：1305-7456

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Thieme

期刊介绍

年发文量	185
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	0%
自引率	9.5%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
95.14%	100.00%	-	-

预警情况

时间	预警情况
2025年03月发布的2025版	不在预警名单中
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q2区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区（2021-2022年最新版）

中科院分区

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
暂无数据