AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST 杂志-刊鹿论文编译

BOOK REVIEW:The Art of Life and Death: Radical Aesthetics and Ethnographic Practice. Andrew Irving. Chicago: Hau Books, 2017. 264 pp.

Abstract:

To live a life in the knowledge of death is an existential conundrum that we all, as mortal beings, have to face. Yet can we really understand, let alone sense, the uncertainty and contingency that are part of a life close to death when we do not have an acute perspective on such a life? How can we describe what it means to live near death—especially when we are not so close to our (biological) finitude yet? The Art of Life and Death is based on long‐term ethnographic collaboration with persons, many of them artists, living with HIV/AIDS in New York City. They consented to share their lives as they experienced illness and approached death—or so they thought. But unlike many dominant academic and public discourses, this book does not merely describe or theorize these lives in terms of suffering, inability, and distress. Yes, the reader witnesses the deep existential fear, confusion, and pain of those persons confronted with their own mortality. Yet the book represents their courage, resilience, and wonderment as well as their surprise of reclaimed, continued life resulting from the antiretroviral treatment that by the turn of the millennium transformed their terminal illness into a chronic condition, meaning that they had to learn “to live again” (66). For Andrew Irving, it is perfectly clear that there is no direct access to the lived experiences of other persons. Nevertheless, he found ways to engage with and learn about the inner worlds of his research participants as they emerged from that period when they lived with the ever‐present possibility of death. The result—an experimental experience‐near ethnography of life and death—is an exceptional achievement that gets under your skin from beginning to end. Living with the uncertainty of illness involves the continuous making and remaking of one s life, which is not only a complex and mutable act but first and foremost a creative one to which the book s title refers. A second meaning of the art of life lies in the inclusion of the research participants’ artworks in the (practice of) ethnography and, with this, the close attention to their aesthetic expressions while facing mortality and experiencing bodily vulnerability. Irving s sensory‐aesthetic approach helps us engage with their social, economic, and moral expectations, their perceptions of time and finitude, as well as their alterity and new perspectives on the world. It is in this spirit that we learn about living with HIV/AIDS. But more than that, The Art of Life and Death offers a much broader exploration and, I would claim, a deeper understanding of “what it means to be a mortal being in a world of perpetual change” (31). This is made possible through an outstanding interweaving of theoretical critique and aspiration, collaborative ethnography, and methodological experimentation and innovation. Introducing the notion of “an imperiled anthropology,” Irving advocates an anthropology that “puts itself in greater peril by venturing beneath the observable and audible surfaces of social life” (70) in order to gain a better understanding of people s inner expressions, dialogues, and imaginative lifeworlds. His call stems from his critique that inner worlds are rarely explored in anthropological research despite the fact that the human propensity to engage in internal dialogue and expression is foundational for experience and action and, hence, is an “integral part of what makes us human” (71). Focusing on inner lifeworlds becomes especially important when studying the lived experiences of terminal illness, because people mostly live through its diverse dimensions through ongoing internal conversations as they struggle with such questions as, Why me? What should I do? Each chapter therefore highlights from a different angle—historical, material, political, confessional, phenomenological, aesthetic, and ironic—the imaginative lifeworlds and inner expressions of Irving s research participants. Through collaborative approaches and the coproduction of knowledge, the book shows how they navigate the challenges of living with HIV/AIDS, which often involves a reorientation of priorities, an unstable body, and a changing sense of self. The strength of Irving s ethnographic practice lies in his efforts to experiment with innovative methods, such as the walking fieldwork that was an attempt by Irving and one of his collaborators, Albert, to combine walking, narration (voice recording), and photography to recap Albert s inner dialogue after he received his diagnosis, while retracing his journey to the clinic and back home almost 20 years later. Another research method juxtaposed his collaborators’ artworks alongside their life histories in order to understand their changing perceptions and inner experiences through the art they produced during periods of illness, stability, crisis, and uncertainty. Throughout the six chapters, Irving shows how art and the senses can be used in fieldwork to reveal people s complex inner worlds and create dialogues. Moreover, he shows that fieldwork itself, like art, is a sensory‐aesthetic activity that opens up imagination and communication. On a more abstract level, each chapter starts the discussion on perceptions of finitude and time by synthesizing philosophical, phenomenological, and ethnographic approaches to these perceptions. Transcending our disciplinary boundaries is, according to Irving, necessary and entails a critical rethinking of our anthropological knowledge, especially when researching the role of lived experience and inner expression. It is sometimes disappointing that he fails to bring the discussion back to anthropological theorizing—for example, about the value and meaning of life in relation to capitalism. That said, I totally agree with him that the question of how to live a life with death is more an ethnographic and methodological issue than a theoretical one. The Art of Life and Death contributes to our understanding of life in the face of death and to the anthropology of finitude and time. This is primarily made possible through Irving s development of unconventional fieldwork methods, which makes the book inspiring, essential reading for anyone interested in new ethnographic methods to more deeply access the complex inner dimensions of human experience.

Author Listing： Yvon van der Pijl

Volume： 46

Pages： 107-108

DOI： 10.1111/AMET.12739

Language： English

Journal： American Ethnologist

AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST

AM ETHNOL

影响因子：2.0

是否综述期刊：是

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：0094-0496

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Wiley-Blackwell

期刊介绍

年发文量	23
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	0%
自引率	10.5%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	US$3000
偏重研究方向	ANTHROPOLOGY-
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
98.44%	42.86%	0.00%	0.00%

预警情况查看说明

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q1区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区 WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方（Web of Science）为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排序，将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级，Q1代表质量最高，即常说的1区期刊。（2021-2022年最新版）
	ANTHROPOLOGY	Q1

关于2019年中科院分区升级版（试行）

分区表升级版（试行）旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著，学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏，“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系，然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力，最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值，得到“期刊超越指数”，作为分区依据。

分区表升级版（试行）的优势：一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点，又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性；二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标，解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言，分区表升级版（试行）突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题，能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力，为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可，已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版（试行）》首次将社会科学引文数据库（SSCI）期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表（试行）设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版（试行）将过渡共存三年时间，推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。提示：中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询，暂无升级版数据，请注意区分。

中科院分区查看说明

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
	法学 3区	ANTHROPOLOGY 人类学 3区	否	否
2021年12月升级版	法学 1区	ANTHROPOLOGY 人类学 1区	否	是
2020年12月旧的升级版	法学 1区	ANTHROPOLOGY 人类学 1区	否	是
2022年12月最新升级版	社会学 1区	ANTHROPOLOGY 人类学 1区	否	是