Australasian Journal of Environmental Management IF值2023-刊鹿论文编译

The power of the narrative

Abstract:

Australian and many other landscapes have been expertly examined not only by scientists but – and more broadly – by creative artists. Thus, Judith Wright, Ken Taylor, John Olsen, Peter Sculthorpe and many others have contributed substantially to appreciation of our natural environment – at both national and international levels in literature, the visual arts, music and dance. Francis Ratcliffe (1938) tackled a broad canvas of the outback with his Flying Fox and Drifting Sand – a book routinely set as prescribed reading for Queensland schoolchildren. Banfield’s Confessions of a Beachcomber ([1908] 1974) is a more localised account that achieved worldwide renown for both E. J. Banfield and Dunk Island, subsequently conserved as a national park. Salcombe Harbour (Kingsbridge Estuary), a long-gazetted Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in Devon, UK, has its genesis in Lord Tennyson’s nineteenth century poem ‘Crossing the Bar’. Du Maurier’s Frenchman’s Creek ([1941] 2015) cemented in the public mind the treasured Helford Passage, made an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (and Special Area of Conservation and Special Site of Scientific Interest) in Cornwall. In the USA, the now-iconic Yellowstone National Park is reported to have been inspired by Lewis and Clark’s journal writings (in 1805) about the region. Reservation of the French Camargue as a World Heritage Centre was reinforced by Christopher Parsons’ A Bull Called Marius (1971) and so on. Through writing and other arts, the future of such areas becomes embedded in national psyches. The arts can capture public imagination, awareness and engagement in a way that regulatory approaches to environmental management cannot. So, can an ‘environmental narrative’ – with a suite of alternative management tools – be developed into a supplementary instrument to environmental legislation to achieve sustainable land management outcomes? Given the persistent concerns about multiple issues in environmental management, we need widespread public engagement to create political suasion for effective action. Authoritative predictions about the future of our natural environment are discouraging, at all levels. For Australia, a review of Ecologically Sustainable Development in this journal summarises Macintosh (2015): ‘While ESD is commonly referenced in much contemporary legislation,... such provisions provide policy makers and regulators with little practical guidance and therefore can do little to protect the interests of future generations’ (Curran and Hollander 2015, 5). To deliver long-term results, the current reliance on government – and in turn on its almost sole management instrument (legislation) – is inadequate (Fisher 2010). Regulations are failing to provide examples of sustainable development and, furthermore, are now fostering noncompliance, revocations of environmental laws and sometimes contrary court interpretations of the law. Other limitations of legislation include the impracticality of effective imposition over a vast and sparsely populated countryside of diverse ecosystems. Thus, while legislation is necessary, we need to go beyond regulatory tools to gain widespread public interest and support and offer more positive management incentive. Jenkins (2016) has advocated a move from reactive management drive to ‘outcomes-based management’ by instruments that generate proactive strategies for environmental

Author Listing： Hugh Lavery;Helen Ross;Claudia Baldwin

Volume： 26

Pages： 105 - 111

DOI： 10.1080/14486563.2019.1632586

Language： English

Journal： Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN

影响因子：1.1

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：1448-6563

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Taylor & Francis

期刊介绍

年发文量	16
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	0%
自引率	9.1%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
期刊官网	https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tjem20/current
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
93.75%	22.41%	0.00%	0.00%

预警情况查看说明

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q4区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区 WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方（Web of Science）为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排序，将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级，Q1代表质量最高，即常说的1区期刊。（2021-2022年最新版）
	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES	Q4

关于2019年中科院分区升级版（试行）

分区表升级版（试行）旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著，学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏，“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系，然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力，最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值，得到“期刊超越指数”，作为分区依据。

分区表升级版（试行）的优势：一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点，又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性；二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标，解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言，分区表升级版（试行）突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题，能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力，为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可，已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版（试行）》首次将社会科学引文数据库（SSCI）期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表（试行）设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版（试行）将过渡共存三年时间，推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。提示：中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询，暂无升级版数据，请注意区分。

中科院分区查看说明

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
	法学 4区	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 环境研究 4区	否	否
2021年12月升级版	法学 4区	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 环境研究 4区	否	否
2020年12月旧的升级版	法学 4区	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 环境研究 4区	否	否
2022年12月最新升级版	社会学 4区	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 环境研究 4区	否	否